udyzr

> But the change you're suggesting removes the fact that John makes changes at all, and it seems like that's important information. Can you explain a bit more why you...

Cit. The first developer, **John**, clones the repository, **makes a change, and commits locally**. (The protocol messages have been replaced with …​ in these examples to shorten them somewhat.) \<...

> Let's also change line 128 to say something like this: > > > While John is busy making his changes, the second developer (Jessica) does the same thing --...

Kindly ask person who sees the need for additional change as pointed to put it into repository. Myself either still didn't review text from this perspective or does not see...

So are contributors free in choice of which grammar checker to use? No English grammar checker recommendations exist in this project?

> Whether you know it or not, you're using this workflow right now. If I want to pull one of your PR branches onto my own machine, I'm playing the...

There is absolutely no issue with integration maintainer's read access to all contributors' public repositories, at far as my humble opinion is concerned. This thicket addresses quite different point. cit.:...

Fortunately details about by which mimics all developers' public forks enable read access for all developers are out of this sub-chapter's scope and do not need to be mentioned in...

My concern is to not raise unnecessary riddles on reader's side. Reader will have enough lot questions to clarify even without such. `featureB` was pushed to `origin/featureBee` prior to diagram...