hammer
hammer copied to clipboard
ucb-bar
Hammer tech JSON validity checker tool
Would be nice to have a hammer shell tool that checks that a technology's .json is valid.
This is the .tech.json equivalent of #160
Yes, I think we still need this since #114 is to make writing MMMC easier and #220 is specific to MMMC. This is needed to help catch errors like gds map flie.
@colinschmidt Are you working on this actively?
No I will be working on #114 and #220 because I think thats the primary cause for need for validation.
TechJSON is now a Pydantic model, so validation is implicit.
I think having printed schema is still helpful - @vighneshiyer thoughts on having our PR CI generate/update a schema.json file using .schema_json() on the TechJSON class?
Technically Pydantic doesn't perform precise validation on types upon deserialization (since it can coerce values found in the JSON to those annotated in the BaseModel). But it will validate that the schema / structure of the JSON matches that of the BaseModel.
And sure we can create a schema file from the TechJSON Model. I think we can have the readthedocs dotfile call a script that produces the schema.json file and we can include it in the docs.
