Jakub Witczak

- @vkatsuba alternative approach compared to #5461 - intention is to leave legacy execution sequence unchanged - but automated execution of "_tests" module can be disabled if not expected (such...

tony can you do some more adjustments in this PR or would you prefer if I take it over and do it? Those are things I was thinking about: 1....

please push it to your fork. I will combine it when time allows. thanks for contribution.

sorry to write this, but I've been busy with other tasks. This need to wait to little longer.

> * [ ] 3. `ssl_session_ticket_SUITE` - we would like to have blackbox tests using ssl API > 1. if we lack some test coverage, we might add some whitebox...

Thanks for work so far. Tests in our environment look good. I would @IngelaAndin to also have a look before we merge.

closing, as #6362 was merged

> > I'm not sure if this (not calling init/end_per_group) is the right thing to do. OTOH one might say what is the use of calling init/end if there are...

yes. no worries. github test results are just early verification (I don't know why re-run are not taken in summary). we've more tests which are successful for this PR. we...

thanks for contribution!