Tyler Slaton
Tyler Slaton
/lgtm Nice, I like the approach here.
I think that this is no longer relevant now that it is a full web-app @sangee2004, if that's true could you go ahead and close this?
In a recent PR by @akihikokuroda we wrote out some logic that allows us to deploy a on-cluster git server for E2E testing. Once that merges we'll want a follow-up...
So the context captured in this PR should allow for this work to be actionable and help us to come to a decision. If there are any needed follow-up questions...
We've gone ahead and opened a new discussion thread to talk about the future of this component. We can decide what to do with this issue once we've reached a...
Working on this is on the roadmap but we need to find the time to do it. The documents that @exdx linked should guide us forward here, at least as...
@timflannagan Would you mind coming back to this issue with some more fleshed-out ideas of what you'd like to see here? That should get this into a more actionable state...
If we added a `ProvisionerClass` API would the controller for reconciling that API be responsible for also deploying the provisioner's needed resources (`Deployments,` `RBAC`, etc)? If it does, then we're...
I'm going to go ahead and freeze this issue. Its been open for awhile and we haven't had any explicit need for this yet. However, there have been questions about...
This is a nice add to the RukPak project and is generally low-hanging fruit (hence the `good-first-issue` tag). However, we're not quite ready to devote team resources to get this...