Simon

@gcanti thanks for doing ts magic :) I do like ".exhaustive()" having compile time errors. I think with ts 2.8 it would be possible to exclude types from checking ```typescript...

> I see that LiteDB v5 supports a SQL-like language which may return different shapes and values than the predefined collection types so in v3 I am thinking of maybe...

Let me try to comment on your latest questions > Goals: > • esmodule output ready to be consumed on the web > > I understand why this is wanted...

> > I'm thinking that expanding the api surface area for wasm file itself might get tricky overtime. I usually use a different approach with rust/wasm. > > Can you...

cc @alice-i-cecile and @jkelleyrtp

If the direction feels right, I'm happy to polish the PR (add code docs, changelog and maybe more tests)

> Would a more passive API like this fit your use case? Are you able to link up the Taffy Node back to the Node from your tree? Of course!...

> Generally, Taffy shouldn't really be storing any of the Node data From my personal experience (including using Yoga) I always wanted to store some small metadata with the nodes...

> My first read of the changes is that `Taffy` is now generic over `T`, where `T: Measure`. Because `T` can only ever be one concrete type at once, how...

> Do you think this paradigm could fit your app? > So, instead of Taffy worrying about the DataToBeMeasured, it just lets you defer to your implementation through the supplied...