Trish Whetzel

I chatted with @matentzn and the current thought is that the medgen xrefs can be added now, but not the mesh ones.

NOTE: The issue of proxy merges is being discussed with MedGen is this issue https://github.com/monarch-initiative/mondo-ingest/issues/491

@kanems is MONDO:0019476 the correct Mondo ID? The label for this is 'primary cutaneous peripheral T-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified' not 'Peripheral T-cell lymphoma'. Also, what CUI do you see...

We have discussed this further and at this time we believe MONDO:0004964 (peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified) & MONDO:0019476 (primary cutaneous peripheral T-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified) to represent...

After reviewing this further, we decided that the hierarchy of this section of Mondo, i.e. subclasses of MONDO:0005372 'male infertility' which includes the term of interest MONDO:0042605 'Y chromosome infertility...

NOTE: this term is on the obsoletion candidate list following this issue: https://github.com/monarch-initiative/mondo/issues/7700 Is it ok then to close this ticket?

@sabrinatoro I am looking over the mondo-edit.obo file, one question is why does `MONDO:0009255` have both of these lines: ``` xref: icd11.foundation:1173858031 {source="MONDO:equivalentTo"} xref: icd11.foundation:1173858031 {source="Orphanet:79237", source="MONDO:equivalentTo"} ``` And for...

I don't know if `NORM` will do that, but worth a try. If not, my next try would be a SPARQL query to find these and manually remove.

Since there is a newer, production version of ICD11 Foundation that we learned about this week this PR will be closed and the lexical alignment will be re-run next week...

@sabrinatoro PR submitted to `mondo-ingest` https://github.com/monarch-initiative/mondo-ingest/pull/562