Martin Connell

I'd be happy to include your DB implementation alongside the standard POTranslationRepository implementation. Can't think of any caveats. IIRC others have made their own DB-based implementations -- not sure whether...

Afraid not. Here's a link for future reference: http://www.gnu.org/software/gettext/manual/html_node/Translating-plural-forms.html Obviously suggestions and contributions welcome on adding this feature e.g. on extending the nugget syntax to support plurals.

Well, all good questions! How do other people implement it, e.g. with the traditional _("message") mechanism? From: Simon Svensson [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 18 December 2013 12:44 To: turquoiseowl/i18n Cc: Martin Connell...

It would seem there are two levels of plurals support in the GNU spec.: the first based on the msgid_plural entry which assumes English type plurals; and the second level...

It doesn't make sense to me to do this unless we support all languages in the way they do plurals. Like Polish, as described in the spec. If we go...

I haven't had a chance to go any further with this. Dunno whether @sisve or anyone else has.Your contribution would be welcome. It will involve modification to the runtime side...

This sounds like a bug in i18n.PostBuild.

Not by me just now. Hoping someone else experiencing the problem can take a look.

Couple of thoughts: 1. Once we move down from the BeginRequest event, the choice of event is somewhat arbitrary: the next guy may want PostAuthorize, as opposed to PostAuthenticate, etc....

I've not seen those build errors myself (using Visual Studio 2013). WRT changes, there have been new settings added but I don't think any have changed/broken. You may want to...