S. Veyrié

> Frankly I couldn't come up with a good way to parallelise a Cypher query in a generic way. Thanks for your answer! I may be mistaken, but that indeed...

> Maybe we can also create a very basic use-case in `scio-example` if you know one Added one in fixup 7669f0abc01562933efd32a9108935667b74b6f4

> for parallel reading in jdbc, we have the `jdbcShardedSelect` I suppose @mattcasters has an opinion on it. However, since the Beam impl is still experimental, is it a good...

> I took some liberty and pushed on your branch some integration tests for neo4j. That's great! Many thanks. I have locally updated the Neo4j docker image pulled by testContainers...

> Thanks a lot for fixing the issues @turb I think the PR is good to go now. I'll open an issue in [magnolify](https://github.com/spotify/magnolify) to support the `RowMapper` automatic derivation...

cc @RustedBones @clairemcginty

> This actually affects all modules. I agree with @turb that `AnyVal`s should not be visible in the destination model after conversion. Agreed, although for others it will be a...

@RustedBones does it mean the PR will have to wait until all cases support it?

> I'm preparing an update for that. I'm almost done. Would it be fine to continue on your branch? Sure!

Note: Scala 2.13.9 broke binary compatibility on case classes that are value classes, so any update on it should go directly from Scala 2.13.8 to 2.13.10. See https://github.com/scala/scala/pull/10155