Charlike Mike Reagent

Hm... this is pretty old. But is it implemented something like this? Sorry, i try and test latest version. /cc @rlidwka

Or just try to read and parse (meaning, get a latest version) local CHANGELOG file. But yea, in long term maybe this would be better.

You may need :) https://www.npmjs.com/package/git-user-name https://www.npmjs.com/package/git-username https://www.npmjs.com/package/parse-git-config https://www.npmjs.com/package/parse-github-url

Great! I'll send a PR for the first 3 bullets.

So, first three are ready with #4 merging. What about the others? :) I don't see value on forcing `.run` to accept only object as first argument, and only one...

Okey, that's what I wanted to hear, like it. :D I'll try.

@jonschlinkert can we process with the last 2 bullets tonight/today? I have some time. :) I'm not sure for the last one should be implemented and how to save current...

Mmm. Problem is on [#L73: `if (!utils.isObject(val)) return;`](https://github.com/jonschlinkert/use/blob/master/index.js#L73) for me. And actually the whole `.run`, because the idea is to be able to pass different number of argument of different...

> required block It would be better to be optional block. `git clone && npm i` is trivial and is no need. For example I set `npm test` in the...

> The more visible the license is to non-technical people, the better. it would be in the most visible place of the repo page, lol - next to the name...