John Wieczorek

The reference Brian gives shows what one community is doing. I am not qualified to speak about what any other communities are doing, but here's my take on what should...

I have nothing against a verbatim field, and agree that it would help with this issue. There is an open request for a new term 'verbatimScientificName' which is stalled at...

There is a 30-day public commentary period on Darwin Core terms and their controlled vocabularies to cover this. See http://lists.tdwg.org/pipermail/tdwg-content/2020-August/003785.html

From @debpaul: "My two cents. Both. Why? Because "verbatim" localities are important for many semantic reasons. If you tease apart all the pieces of a locality string on a herbarium...

Such an interesting discussion, getting at the fundamentals of the Organism concept, identifiers, relationships, and how to deal with them at a global level. Maybe one blessing is that we...

Have one just for that sort of thing. Just need someone(s) to right the check(s).

The issue has is relevant to relationships in general, and in that respect is similar to issue #77.

Easy one! Ha, just kidding. I think a ResourceRelationship [1] has the most potential expressivity and explicitness. The other options are not really meant for this level of richness, not...

On 14:34, Tue, Jul 3, 2018 Dag Endresen wrote: > > Reply to: >> >> Is there anything about the data that would prevent them from being modeled on an...

Since the implementation of the ChronometricAge extension (https://tools.gbif.org/dwca-validator/extension.do?id=http://zooarchnet.org/dwc/terms/ChronometricAge), the age (time) can be much more rigorously captured and shared. This leaves lithostratigraphicTerms to be for the rock name. I would...