kaliiiiiiiiiii

Results 145 comments of kaliiiiiiiiiii

@ultrafunkamsterdam Any intentions into fixing that issue?

> Please upvote this comment if you are using persistent context for some other reason. Reply explaining your specific use case if possible. @dgozman Testing chrome extensions for multiple contexts...

did you try ```shell lsusb ``` to ckeck if your adapter actually connects to your usb port?

@AlexPaiva 1. Have you checked if the `--user-data-dir=C:/some_path/data` is valid? 2. The chrome process starts at https://github.com/kaliiiiiiiiii/Selenium-Driverless/blob/4e478d26ce7090192ff45d835e1efb31bd7bf98c/src/selenium_driverless/webdriver.py#L220 , check what path & arguments are there.

@AlexPaiva Does it work with `driverless_options=False` btw?

@milahu > would you be interested in collaboration? > (spoiler: i will use MIT license) Surely, why not:) > i have a working prototype for handling file downloads (and html...

Or did you mean that you'd like to use driverless as a base for this project?

> if you want to see my current mess: [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]) I'll send you an E-Mail. > translate html responses to json responses Huh how'd you wanna do that? Run some...

> > im pretty sure that something like this exists somewhere... > > yepp, i have reinvented [botasaurus](https://github.com/omkarcloud/botasaurus) botasaurus uses selenium internally. Also, JaveScript execution such as https://github.com/omkarcloud/botasaurus/blob/dba618c26da74263cc4af33a13faf41cb7a30ae3/botasaurus/anti_detect_driver.py#L216 for sure...

looked shortly into the code you've got so far. Stuff I notice here: 1. UBlock Extension to my knowledge is pretty invasive (js execution, network blocking, etc.) and I'm pretty...