Timur Sağlam

> @jplag/maintainer in a followup PR we could also remove the direct deps to the front ends (only the CLI should point to them. Other libraries should include the front...

> For the tests, yes`.. but for more? Only for tests afaik.

> Should we rename any `Language` to something like `JavaLanguage` or `LanguagJava`? I would wait with that until the practicals are over and we rename/refactor the frontends.

Some of these issues are currently being addressed by @JanWittler, his PR will follow soon.

I like the idea, and it sounds like an excellent potential improvement to the current CLI. The goal of such an overhaul should be to grant the flexibility to deal...

@sebinside I am thinking maybe we can turn this into a PISE topic for the next summer term?

That means we will make this issue (at least partly) into a student project for our practical course. Basically, masters students from KIT contribute to research/open source projects as part...

> do we already have an issue for that? Now we have one: #591

The technical report on JPlag contains different plagiarism classes, this might also be a starting point.

@SuyDesignz see this paper for many types of plagiarism patterns: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7910274 I also overhauled the issue description to make things clearer.