Joe Pea
Joe Pea
Thinking back on it, it would be possible that instead of ```js const div = s``; ``` we could write ```js const div = s``; ``` but I think this...
These sorts of changes could eliminate the need for `eval()`, which would reduce the compile time from `compile+eval` to just `compile`!
Interesting thoughts. In number 2, instead of writing `myClassName()`, in the template string one would just write `myClassName` and Surplus would run it. ```js s`` ``` Would that work? In...
Nice thoughts by Ryan. There isn't one way of doing things, and by having an alternative we can all learn how to make something even better. Arguably though, with the...
If it doesn't exist yet, it'd be a nice feature to have some way of making it possible via syntax. The reason being that one might have some library (f.e....
Although that path is less ideal, it definitely seems possible. Looks like you could use [`recast`](https://github.com/benjamn/recast) to - take the babel AST and turn it into JS with source map,...
Not necessary for me anymore persay as I just ported it from the text mate version. http://github.com/trusktr/seti.vim
Thanks for pointing that out @z3dev, I'll check it out.
Besides passing callbacks from JS to TS, the other way around would be useful. For example, then we could allow a user who is writing AS code to run things...
The difference: http://thesassway.com/editorial/sass-vs-scss-which-syntax-is-better