Thomas Stringer

Thanks for the information! Do you have specific events in mind? I might be misunderstanding.

@ryanburgess great, will do! Thanks!!! :+1:

That's a good question, and agreed that we're somewhere in between implementations for single vs multiple mesh. I think the driving question that we need to answer here (which I...

These are all really good points. From my perspective, we have three options here: 1. Keep the underlying multi-mesh code as-is and remove the user experience from the CLI so...

I agree with @keithmattix. I think relying on OPA is fine for an immediate solution to unblock users, but we should be making this a lot easier. I'd say we...

Yeah this works for me! Adding it to v1.3.

Yes, the different use case is that GateKeeper provides a Kubernetes-native layer on top of OPA that gives user a more intuitive way of working with policies. So even though...

I do think so. A unified approach would be a more direct and better experience for users that prefer OPA-based policy management.

My understanding is that we would want to allow OSM users to specify policies through a common policy engine (OPA) that can be delivered through the Kubernetes-native approach with GateKeeper....

Thank you for opening this issue! What other proxy are you looking to use with OSM? At the moment we only support Envoy and have no current plans for any...