trislett

Hi @mgogniat , The indirect effect (SobelZ) from the voxel-wise mediation are in the output directory. The intermediate steps are calculated internally. If you need each step, I recommend calculating...

Hi Rob, Yes, just use a mask for the region of interest. Please consider that the ROI should be sufficiently large enough in which it makes sense to TFCE. Cheers,...

Hi Alex, This is not a bug. The adjacency for TFCE and the FWHM smoothing (it's from Freesurfer) are not equivalent. Cheers, Tris

Hi Alex, Sorry for the late reply. There's no cut-off since the vertices are already FWER corrected. So when you have a 'cluster' that is only 2 or 8 vertices,...

Hi Alex, For my own preference, I would report the FWER corrected image as figures for the main result. This best represents the actual statistical analyses performed. Cheers, Tris

@HippocampusGirl there seems to an issue with referencing the adjacency set with cython. Any thoughts? @mgogniat I have few of questions: (a) Which version of TFCE_mediation are you using? (b)...

Here it is: https://github.com/trislett/TFCE_mediation/blob/3bccf6ee17703d353bfebaae343f2bdec558be0c/tfce_mediation/tmanalysis/STEP_1_voxel_tfce_mediation.py#L78

@HippocampusGirl that was my first thought too. I used the script successfully yesterday. STEP_0 should automatically reduced the mask data to nonzero data. However, this may not work if there...

@mgogniat Thank you for the information. There's no obvious issue with your input. Just to double check, are you running the command from the same directory as python_temp folder? Does...

Hi Marissa (@mgogniat ), I finally got a RHEL/fedora virtual image up an running, and I haven't had any issues. Both of your outputs suggests that TFCE_mediation is being run...