Tres Finocchiaro

> For the sudo: this is because some people try to do this in a folder where they have not enough rights, sudo will always 'win' in this case. No...

I'm not yet familiar with `AppImageLauncher`, I was told that `appimaged` was deprecated in favor of this. To that point, this is just adding a command's bash-completion to user-space upon...

@azubieta good point. If the current user-space specification does not permit the use of an equivalent of the root `bash-completion.d` directory, it would require something like a one-time script chunk...

> Yes. Question: I have 5 different versions of `foo` installed. Which one will "win" in terms of bash completion? Good question. I have a counter-question and it may be...

> Yes. Question: I have 5 different versions of `foo` installed. Which one will "win" in terms of bash completion? Can't this same question be asked for all AppImage registrations?...

The disambiguous use-case isn't an issue in my tests. Works fine so as long as the functions are properly prefixed with `_myapp`. Even if it renames something it did not...

Oh, I see the bug... `_helper_function`. Yeah, I would consider that a bug with the completion, not the `sed`. Internal functions should be namespaced. The same bug could exist outside...

> AppImage is about GUI applications first and foremost. macOS .app bundles don't install command line completion either... not saying I'm strongly against it, but it's really not the focus...

Just ran into the same issue, `Makeself version 2.4.0`, Ubuntu 20.04 / ARM64. Is there a workaround?

So I managed to fix this by changing the directory I build from. Was on a Parallel's shared volume. Not sure why changing to a local directory fixed it... I'm...