Thomas R. Bromley

Do we expect any performance overhead from doing validation on each call?

@mudit2812 don't we have a PR open to support custom wire labels with deferred measurements?

Thanks @NickGut0711 for posting, we'll let you know once we have a fix for this.

Thanks @ArturDomingues! Mixed qudit-qudit devices is a great idea and something that we have discussed about before. We're gradually increasing our $d>2$ capabilities, e.g., with an upcoming mixed-qutrit device thanks...

Thanks @JustinWoodring for posting, we definitely appreciate feature requests and subsequent code contributions. In this case, I'd first like to understand a little more about the motivations for this feature....

Thanks for the extra context @JustinWoodring. If you have a QNode that already returns a probability distribution with `qml.probs()`, I'm not sure that having a `qml.plot_probabilities(circuit)` will add much more...

Thanks everyone for getting this merged!

Thanks @mudit2812! Closing this for now, but let's make sure to record these improvements in Shortcut so that we can draw from the backlog in future.

This story is currently in our backlog. @mudit2812 when we do revisit the story, do you imagine we'd use this current PR or start afresh? If the latter, we could...

This PR is replaced by #5306.