Thomas R. Bromley

Thanks @babcockt18! Yes this sounds like a nice idea and should be achievable for sums/products of the standard [observables](https://docs.pennylane.ai/en/stable/introduction/operations.html#observables) like `X`, `Y`, `Z`, etc. We could initially restrict to operators...

Sorry @babcockt18, I lost track of replying to this. Would you still be interested on working on this feature?

@DSGuala what do you recommend here? Are we happy to merge this in as a net improvement? It looks like the drawbacks are just that users might not have `rich`...

Closing as this is no longer needed.

> Plexpr Is that the working name for a PL program representation? :laughing:

Hi @joeybarreto, this is a good question. Right now, PennyLane is quite dimension-dependent - we have support for both qubits and [qutrits](https://docs.pennylane.ai/en/stable/introduction/operations.html#qutrit-operators), but it would be great to generalize to...

How shall we proceed with this PR? Is this something that could be put in the Q3 technical roadmap?

> > How shall we proceed with this PR? Is this something that could be put in the Q3 technical roadmap? > > I would 100% say this is something...

@albi3ro shall we close this prototype branch now that the capture work is well underway?

@albi3ro, what is the status of this PR? Should we close it?