Thomas O'Dowd

This PR has been rebased on top of PR202 again (PR202 was rebased on top of the latest master and one other commit was added to fix a race condition...

Hi @wader - good to hear from you. I added another patch to #202 a few minutes ago, so yes, I will also rebase this one again. Before I rebase,...

Hi @wader - I rebased this branch on top of #202 again. I have tested it on linux and windows. Seems to work ok. I'll be doing more testing. Let...

Thanks. I'm also having the same issue validating with tools-python.

Here's a snippet showing the feature is working against a vagrant guest. ``` $ sudo virsh dumpxml 34 | grep -A 4 '

Awesome. Thanks @celebdor. Hopefully it will get merged soon. It seems to be working well for me also.

Ok. Will have a look. Just poking around, there is already 'cpu_model' config which looks like it used to be used for architecture from the looks of the README. However...

I created a pull request to address this issue. It's my first time looking at ruby code :-) https://github.com/adrahon/vagrant-kvm/pull/272

Hi @kzantow - Thanks for looking at this. I realised that my reproduction instructions were not accurate as I had a syft.yaml file in the directory. I removed this file...

with respect to: > This error is also not according to the spec: license_info_in_file is mandatory in SPDX-2.2. The [spec says](https://spdx.github.io/spdx-spec/v2.2.2/package-information/#714-all-licenses-information-from-files-field), also: >> (shall be omitted) if FilesAnalyzed is false....