Toshihiro Suzuki
Toshihiro Suzuki
I prefer the second option!🤩 But further I would rename existing one as "unsafe" and introduce new safe one without safe/unsafe prefix. ```swift // newly added (might need to rename...
> Should these be named "unsafe" too? I feel not. IMHO I feel yes to this one. If crash is caused by the `UserDefaults` itself, then it's fine. (I see...
Maybe this article helps. https://qiita.com/ShingoFukuyama/items/e85d34360f3f951ca612
Hello Realm😇
Now it appears in the ファイル ( File ? ) app. Not sure how many user is aware of this place. 
Understood!👌 And before creating the zip file, I know we need to change `@rpath` of the executable [for swift toolchain](https://github.com/toshi0383/scripts/blob/master/swiftpm/release.sh#L31) and [for dyld loading path](https://github.com/toshi0383/scripts/blob/master/swiftpm/release.sh#L35), using `install_name_tool`. Because - Some...
I don't know since when, but Swift now embeds C and objc libraries directly. So I guess latter workaround isn't necessary anymore.
I'm considering about where to put downloaded binaries and resources(man-pages and assets from `Package.resources`). Whether it should be symlinked or just overwrite existing under `/usr/local/`. @yonaskolb What do you think?
As I've commented in https://github.com/yonaskolb/XcodeGen/issues/234#issuecomment-368287221 , in CI there is no point to use mint for binary install. (because user need to build `mint` at first anyways.) So I guess...
Wow this has been inactive long time, sorry. As we discussed so far, with the interface like this, ``` mint install author/[email protected] --github-binary portable_tool.zip/tool ``` under the hood mint would...