Torrin

If you have a test we can use to see this issue that would be helpful (maybe something we should add to the OMFIT regression tests since those currently seem...

Do you have an example of where the `core_profiles` machine mapping works? ``` with ods.open('d3d', 1795780001): psi = ods[f'core_profiles.profiles_1d.:.grid.psi'] ``` I've tried several shots but always see errors like this:...

Thanks for the explanation Brendan! If I'm understanding correctly, the `sigma_B0_eff` vs `sigma_Ip_eff` distinction is retained in order to support transformations outside the standard COCOs 1-18. Does OMAS have options...

The only official information I know of is the description provided by IMAS https://gafusion.github.io/omas/schema/schema_em%20coupling.html In practice we are storing the EFIT Green function tables there and using them in similar...

The tests that use `d3d.json` from the local omas version also pass just fine. It's only when omas tries to fetch it from master that the tests fail. I don't...

All of the missing equilibrium quantities are expected for older shots unfortunately. It was caused by a difference in names in the NetCDF files EFIT wrote and their pointnames in...

Just to make sure this is clear, I don't think any TDI magic can fix these equilibrium entries. The data wasn't saved to MDS+ because efitloader was looking for different...

@orso82 the challenge with the `em_coupling` matrices is not that the rows or columns need to have different COCOs, it's that each dimension does. For example using the matrix A...