TÖRÖK Attila
TÖRÖK Attila
This might be nit-picking, and I understand that this is due to the generated nature of the code, but still, looking at the final result: I feel like the `[static]`...
I'm not trying to be a downer all the time, but TBH I'm not a fan of adding a bunch of unused files (those referring to unknown types), and commented...
Good observations, @danielhjacobs! > Additionally, I'm unsure if other developers may request tests be added for some of these classes. Also great point, but IMHO these event classes are so...
Do you think we should maybe add a little note in a comment at the top of every newly added, autogenerated file, stating something like "this file was autogenerated from...
I think the formatting of the code could use some adjustments (I saw a bit too many empty lines for my taste), but I guess that can be addressed together...
Was `DRMStatusEvent` omitted because of the too many AIR-only properties?
> Yes, here is the message I currently thought up: That sounds about right. Maybe the first line could be split into two somewhere, but this is also nitpicking... :)...
This was on a very old version of Ruffle. It was fixed a long time ago by https://github.com/ruffle-rs/ruffle/pull/6607.
Indeed, this loop has been silent even before #4273. I have noticed very similar behavior in all these loops: - 166 - 916 - 952 - 1115 - 1875 -...
Just curious, does this do anything for #7533?