Terji Petersen

I agree this is useful for typing purposes but otherwise not, so I'm -1 on putting them is the main namespace. I suggest they go into `pd.api.types` namespace, either directly...

Hi @rhshadrach. I'm positive to adding the groupby classes to the public namespace and my only hesitance is whether to put them in the main namespace or not. My feeling...

+1 on somewhere in pd.api, I don't have a very strong preference on `pd.api.types` or `pd.api.typing`. Maybe just make update the PR with your preferred solution (`pd.api.typing`?), remove the draft...

I think using PeriodIndex, but all having ``freq=‘d’`` could get confusing. Does the JSON contain frequncy data? Then PeriodIndex could be used, but with correct freq, which would actually be...

I've read through this and issue and I agree with @pratyushsharan that this works as intended in that is works similar to `resample`, thought I can also see a case...

This looks like a `numexpr` issue as this works without it: ``` In [1]: import pandas as pd In [2]: df = pd.DataFrame({'A': ['a', 'b'], 'B': ['1', '2']}) In [3]:...

#50052 should not be om this list, it is part of the pandas 1.x -> 2.0 cleanup process.

Likewise #49560. EDIT: ive removed both of them from the list.

I've added it, thanks @DeaMariaLeon. More generally, I can see several deprecatons in the [pulse](https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/pulse) that have not been added, e.g. #52986 & #52981. To my knowledge all deprecations should...

@pandas-dev/pandas-core, looks like we need to be more mindful of adding deprecations to this list. Or is there an alternative method of knowing which deprecations have been done?