Tomasz Chmielewski

I'm a network engineer and Netbox enthusiast, but I'm new to git, and especially new to github forking/review model. I'm sorry in advance for slow responsiveness and some clumsiness in...

Hi @danner26 , I'm sorry for late reply - I had some days off. I think I've implemented the changes requested by @DanSheps, and the model should be 100% fine...

> @tonnerrek Can you please send us an export of the configration with the interface names? Some of them look a little weird. I havent used this specific model so...

@danner26 It's incorrect. I'm on it, but due to some ongoing meetings my progress is very slow. Please give me ca. 10 minutes and I'll let you know once I...

Hello @danner26, I removed the "_flat" models, that were built to for legacy netbox versions. Such version is still running at my work, but I will keep them in a...

Hi @danner26 , On ASR9902 there are only built-in ports, but depending on port-group configuration either 100GbE or 10GbE ports are active. Currently, on my node I have 4x100GbE configured,...

Here are the default port speed values: ``` RP/0/RP0/CPU0:ipt-lss923-b-crn-01#show controllers np valid-port-groups all location 0/0/CPU0 Fri Jan 6 19:49:52.631 CET Node: 0/0/CPU0: ---------------------------------------------------------------- NP0: Valid Port Groups ----+---------------------+---------------------+---------------------+--------------------- SEL |...

@danner26 you're right, thanks for spotting this! I must admit that I did not think it though well. My assumption was that I have various module-bay slot types (e.g. FAN,...

@danner26 Thank you for the example. If I get it correctly, in that case: mgmt port of Controller A will be present as "mgmtport_3" and of Controller B as "mgmtport_4"...

@danner26 Did the behavior change in some recent releases? I'm running 3.3.5 and I just instantiated this Dell storage array:  On my side the ports inherited from modules get...