Thomas Langkamp

or in the new "workspace settings" because the expected confidence level most likely will change between projects / data sets.

Just adding a reference from an old duplicate (https://github.com/jasp-stats/jasp-issues/issues/197): van Borkulo, C. D. (2018). Network comparison test: Permutation-based test of differences in strength of networks. See https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317493228_A_tutorial_on_R_package_NetworkComparisonTest_NCT Network Comparison Test...

Will partly be fixed by: https://github.com/jasp-stats/jaspTTests/pull/236

@vandenman Idea: Lets go with 2 columns then, the first for ordinal vars, the second for metric vars. Green are the 3 new ADs  [mock.ods](https://github.com/jasp-stats/jasp-issues/files/14602307/mock.ods)

related - adding results as a table: https://github.com/jasp-stats/jasp-issues/issues/1597 - make number of decimals configurable: https://github.com/jasp-stats/jasp-issues/issues/2205 - So this issue can discuss the new aspect of reversce calculation @Franck6S please rename...

@KilianSander Sorry, this is still not available in JASP 0.19 beta. But it will not be forgotten. Is there an R-package that implements this, maybe even an update for emmeans...

Same request of providing more effect size options for RM tTest here: https://github.com/jasp-stats/jasp-issues/issues/38

@JorisGoosen @RensDofferhoff Is a fix for this planned for 0.19? @natmaka Natmaka posted this update accidentaly in another thread: > It still does not work (here) with JASP 0.18.3. >...

Closing as duplicate of #2946 now. Lets disuss there.

A colleague asked for the per SEM model comparison feature. Apparently it was implemented in JASP 0.9 as shown here via an "advanced" tab: https://youtu.be/i7rVZXLgOG8?si=fSiN_kFOs-iCOsbY&t=196 That tab does not exist...