Tom Burge

> Is this on the roadmap? This is a huge limitation and should be mentioned in the docs. Also a targeted time frame would be good. Some other partners have...

This issue is still not fixed and I'm on Amplify CLI version 10.5.2. I'm having to add a custom policy for the post confirmation lambda since the lambda only has...

I'm having the same issue. Here is my code: ``` from dataclasses import dataclass, field from typing import List from src.hardshell.checks.base import BaseCheck from pystemd.systemd1 import Manager, Unit @dataclass class...

I was able to fix the issue by adding these to my spec file: ``` hiddenimports=[ "pystemd.base", "pystemd.dbusexc", "pystemd.dbuslib", ], ```

That makes sense! Thanks for the clarification!

The workaround makes sense if you are only concerned about current members. I didn't include the tests, but I ran into some issues with existing districts like Texas districts 1-10...

Here are three sets just checked. I wonder if redistricting has something to do with it. Has Results: Congress 118 District 3 State TX No Results: Congress 100 District 3...

I just looped through Congresses 97-118 and I got this: No member found for Congress: 97, District: 10, State: TX No member found for Congress: 98, District: 10, State: TX...

I just validated with the same loop and adding currentMember = False fixes the issue. Is it possible to add a default value of currentMember = False to the API...

Sorry this has taken so long for me to come back to. The code in the gist is Python not Typescript so I might not be doing it right, but...