Tomaz Fernandes

Hi @alxxyz and @eddumelendez, thanks for looking into this. I came up with a simple workaround by subclassing `MSSQLServerContainer.java` and overriding a few methods. It's been a while - not...

From the top of my head, perhaps adding a hook such as `executeAfterSuccessfulConnection` or similar in the parent class, to be optionally implemented by subclasses such as `MSSQLServerContainer`.

Sure! Though I remember there was some lifecycle gotcha in what I was trying to achieve - not sure what exactly. I think the use case would be creating the...

I remember we used flyway for schema migration with Spring Data JPA, and it tried to connect to `myDB` before we had a chance to do anything. Not sure if...

@maciejwalkowiak, I remember you mentioned you had something for this, is there anything I can help with?

Hi, I'll add some initial considerations. Please let me know if this makes sense to you. ### Sync vs. Async I think one key feature of `AWS SDK 2.0` is...

> We can also adopt idea of async operations for other integrations. Sure! Though this raises another question, which is exposing the `Sync` vs `Async` clients as beans. I know...

Sure, makes sense. Just wanted to know your thoughts on it - thanks! I think we can leave any async / blocking matters for other integrations as a separate issue,...

Well, I may be missing something, but the issue is regarding the `S3AsyncClient` rather `SqsAsyncClient`. Regardless, I agree that this being a `SDK 2.0` solution, it might be interesting offering...

> @tomazfernandes I guess there is a performance penalty for using async clients in sync manner (with join) vs pure sync clients in sync scenarios, right? Hmm, not so sure...