todace
todace
> the only change that would make sense to me is to prevent re-declaration in the same scope. The current behavior is "meh", however setting to null the previous variable...
> Yes, that was expected to break some stuff, that would be for Squirrel 3.2. Just to notice - in current stage this seems like a dangerous change. I think...
using .. for string concatenation can be dangerous, as one dot is used to indexing local foo = {bar = 2} local baz = foo..bar //typo. but it would work...
I've found that use of + for string concatenation is dangerous + when used with numerals and strings mixed is not associative operation (a+b)+c != a + (b+c) That means...
@albertodemichelis can you review this PR please?