Tobias Diez

> We cannot yet switch to it. Should work with the changes of this PR. Give it a try: https://github.com/mkoeppe/sage/pull/20

> Obviously, when you replace namespace packages by ordinary packages, then namespace package support is not needed. What's there to try out. Matthias, it's not my fault that Cython's namespace...

> > Cython's namespace package support has bugs. So what's the problem with not using it (for now, until it's ready)? > > Once again, Sage is not affected by...

I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA

@dmadisetti I cannot comment on https://github.com/marimo-team/marimo/pull/7151, so let me respond here: > Ah, ok. We can also pre-package the bins for molab, but I think the official sage distribution is...

> Thanks for opening this @tobiasdiez - but I was under the impression sagemath-standard was the general package for distribution `sagemath-standard` refers to the old setuptools-based distribution, which by now...

No not really, you do need to distribute both versions. But the metric "unpacked size" is misleading anyway, since distributing an esm version would actually allow bundlers to treeshake effectively...

Yes, reducing the distribution size is particularly important for edge/serverless, but more generally many popular fullstack frameworks like next or nuxt run the server build through webpack or vite, and...

Thanks for your interest! We are currently in the process of migrating the search syntax to Lucene (see #8206 for ongoing work). So in early prototypes its a good idea...

I would say the headings should be static and predefined (at least for now). A good starting point would be to have a single category "Authors" whose contents is a...