Add mapping for 'sage' to 'sagemath'

[tobiasdiez]

📝 Summary

Adds the correct upstream Python package for the sage import.

🔍 Description of Changes

Alternative to https://github.com/marimo-team/marimo/pull/7151. Here we use the official upstream package as the target of the mapping, and not an unofficial fork.

📋 Checklist

• [x] I have read the contributor guidelines.
• [ ] For large changes, or changes that affect the public API: this change was discussed or approved through an issue, on Discord, or the community discussions (Please provide a link if applicable).
• [ ] I have added tests for the changes made.
• [ ] I have run the code and verified that it works as expected.

[vercel[bot]]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
marimo-docs	Ready	Preview	Comment	Nov 12, 2025 3:13am

[github-actions[bot]]

All contributors have signed the CLA ✍️ ✅
_{Posted by the CLA Assistant Lite bot.}

[tobiasdiez]

I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA

[tobiasdiez]

@dmadisetti I cannot comment on https://github.com/marimo-team/marimo/pull/7151, so let me respond here:

Ah, ok. We can also pre-package the bins for molab, but I think the official sage distribution is what most users would expect

Let me know if I can help with the pre-building of sagemath (which is indeed the recommended Python package to install). It can be installed using pip / uv / ... as documented at https://doc-develop--sagemath.netlify.app/html/en/installation/source (you have to ensure though that all required system packages are available). We are working on providing binary wheels.

[dmadisetti]

Thanks for opening this @tobiasdiez - but I was under the impression sagemath-standard was the general package for distribution

[user202729]

I can't speaking for everyone, but objectively

• sagemath-standard released has indeed stopped since 10.8.b1, and nobody has gotten around to fix it yet
• I'm not working on any packaging aspect.

So, if you can get sagemath to work, great, problems solved. If not, I don't mind providing an unofficial fork (*) for 10 years (**) until sage finally provide binary packages.

(*) if you are scared of malwares, just pin to a particular version. But I doubt... Also that you're stuck on the equivalent of 10.6 or so. You can give a warning to the user if you want.

(**) maybe exaggeration, maybe not.

[tobiasdiez]

Thanks for opening this @tobiasdiez - but I was under the impression sagemath-standard was the general package for distribution

sagemath-standard refers to the old setuptools-based distribution, which by now is discontinued and no longer present in the sagemath git repo. sagemath is the new meson-based distribution that should be used now (it was introduced in https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/39548, at that point still in parallel to sagemath-standard).