Tomoya Kashifuku

I think this is an expected behavior. `expect(element).not.toHaveclass(...classes)` doesn't mean "none of the classes is had by the element" but "the element does not have all of the classes". You...

> it would be making the API less flexible I think my suggestion makes the API requiring more effort, but also MORE flexible 😉 --- So how can we ensure...

Any update for this? I want the bug to be fixed, so I would create another PR if you don't finish this.

@hunxjunedo Thanks for mentioning. I fixed it.

I've realized that this issues is come from rc-picker. I've created [an issue](https://github.com/react-component/picker/issues/757) and [a PR](https://github.com/react-component/picker/pull/758) to that package. After it is merged, we can update the dependency of this...

Since version 4.0.0, urql started to support for `'text/event-stream'` response (https://github.com/urql-graphql/urql/pull/3050). Because msw just bypasses server sent event, urql requests are not intercepted. https://github.com/mswjs/msw/blob/670dda7b97f6430418d6faf09698f9a1bca5cf07/src/mockServiceWorker.js#L91-L94 Actually it's not a technical issue...

`*` is just a wild card and `accept: */*` means it accepts any content types. (https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Accept#directives)

Now I understand that probably you implemented it intentionally. So this becomes a feature request, not a bug report. https://github.com/markuplint/markuplint/blob/d05bcb8f4a2e024e298a4c1e0d3dd29ab4d1a26b/packages/%40markuplint/file-resolver/src/config-provider.ts#L77-L89 However, I think it would be easy to clutter the...

Can anyone help me to fix ci problem? https://github.com/dotansimha/graphql-code-generator/actions/runs/6524719251/job/17716636556?pr=9708

@saihaj Could you please provide some advice on how to approach this? As I mentioned in the description, I know it is kind a breaking change so we may need...