tnovotny

trying to get my PR into boost::lockfree was a very frustrating experience. my PR [(#27)](https://github.com/boostorg/lockfree/pull/27) was simply closed to go on with this one even though it did not support...

that was about my experience. poor to no feedback on this topic

@timblechmann feedback?

I patched spsc_queue so that it works for me. I posted about this in the boost mailing list here: [getting a move only type into spsc_queue](http://lists.boost.org/boost-users/2016/07/86393.php). In the meantime I...

I'll tidy the stuff up a little a locally, push it, and then do a PR.

@cor3ntin I made the pull request [minimal changes to allow single move only values to be pushed and poped #27](https://github.com/boostorg/lockfree/pull/27) on Aug 3, 2016 and have received no feedback.

@timblechmann But they do different things. This one works with move-only types such as `unique_ptr` where as the other simply does some optimizations for move-able types. [#31](https://github.com/boostorg/lockfree/pull/31) but fails on...

@timblechmann I'm sure [#27](https://github.com/boostorg/lockfree/pull/27) can be made c++98 compatible by simply hiding the functionality via `#defines`. We can also do them one after another, first move-able and then move-only.