tnovotny

TL;DR that would be fine In my initial sketch (not given) it looked messier becaue I had used an in situ lambda, but looking at it now in a cleaner...

Here a link to a simple working [example](http://coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/007d411a68c1082e) based primarily on the existing pipes code. It no longer uses "smart output iterators" as they are too "dumb". I removed the...

Here is a more extensive [example](http://coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/e5a29202af061211) that removes some of the constraints in the previous one. In the example, the top part in the namespace pipes is essentially code form...

Yes, that works, but not the way that I would like it to work. My code example did not compile, but the change I wanted was to make it compile...

OK, you are right, maybe that answer didn't clear things up as much as I had hoped, and after some rethinking, there is the issue of what `to_out_stream` would do...

Can this please be go forward. I really need this and want to get rid of my own version [(#27)](https://github.com/boostorg/lockfree/pull/27).

@timblechmann it would also be nice if you could also look at my pull request, because if I remember correctly, this will not suffice for move only types, as more...

@timblechmann so, here's pinging you again.

@timblechmann i find it really frustrating that you are showing no effort in maintaining this library. would you please give feedback on the outstanding pull requests.

@timblechmann and another two weeks.