Nik
Another vote for this feature, would be a nice addition 🙏
Hi, did you mean [loggercheck](https://github.com/timonwong/loggercheck)? I decided to focus on `slog`-specific checks to not overlap with this linter too much. Sure, some `sloglint` checks can be applied to different logging...
So, `klog` wraps `slog` with key-value style arguments, and you'd like to perform `slog` checks on it, did I get it right? I'll work on the wrappers support and let...
@tstraley Could you provide an example of the wrappers you use? I'm currently researching the possibility to automate detection of slog wrappers, without the need to specify custom rules first....
Hey, sorry for the late reply, I'm kinda busy these days. I've actually got something close to working regarding this feature, just need a bit more work to handle edge...
I understood your use case, will try to implement the feature.
I'm not sure we need this 🤔 Early versions of `musttag` used to produce detailed reports similar to what you have implemented in this PR. It turned out to be...
> What happens if there are multiple missing tags? > > If it reports only one field, then multiple runs will be required, it doesn't seem like a good behavior....
> It is for cases when users would want to have all the fields required and would want to just type that once? Yes. Or just a group of variables:...
I completely forgot that `slog.Group()` existed. I agree, it should not be reported.