Thomas Müller comments

Results 9 comments of


                                            Thomas Müller

make uri_for receive a name for a route

> There are only two hard things in Computer Science: cache invalidation and naming things. > _Phil Karlton_ I like `named_route` for defining a routes name a lot. It is...

make uri_for receive a name for a route

Sounds good. Maybe `named_uri` and `named_uri_for` makes it clear, that both keywords are to be used in conjunction. But `named_route` and `named_uri_for` would be ok, too.

make uri_for receive a name for a route

Hi Sawyer X, I know, you are busy being the new perl Pumpkin. But are there any knews on this issue?

make uri_for receive a name for a route

I was just asking. Really, don't rush it. Do this releases plugins work and if this feature makes it into the next release, it will be just fine. I like...

make uri_for receive a name for a route

Simple an elegant, I like it. Should also work with `any product => ['get', 'post'] ...`

[feature request] add support for puppeteer

Hi @henrypp, near future calling ;) Any news on this issue?

Support nested elements on @child and @children

Since #590 is closed, can this be closed as well?

make uri_for receive a name for a route

Thanks @xsawyerx for implementing and releasing.

Memoize functions for Task and TaskEither

Memoization of Task could be done this way: ```typescript import { memoize as memoizeF } from "fp-ts-std/Function"; import { memoize as memoizeIO } from "fp-ts-std/IO"; import type { Eq }...