Mooneer Salem

I was looking for package statistics and found this: https://repology.org/project/freedv-gui/versions Basically, only Arch and some sort of Windows package repo appear to be on 1.9.4. Every other distro's freedv package...

> > > The concern would be if the distro maintainers decide to remove FreeDV packages because "people can just use Flatpak". I'm not sure how likely that is, though....

If sioclient was added as a Git submodule, would that help at all? Or would Fedora and other distros still not be able to grab it for building packages?

> Well, I tried to get freedv to build using the sioclient-cpp package but I can't get it to find and use the include files. I expect @tmiw knows how...

> > > Well, I tried to get freedv to build using the sioclient-cpp package but I can't get it to find and use the include files. I expect @tmiw...

Considering that it's complaining about standard library functions not being there, I suspect something is messed up in one or more of the Fedora compiler/library packages :( Might be worth...

> Dear friends, I observed that this issue is active & recent posts coming. But, I see them - please correct to me if I'm wrong - about something away...

> Notice this happens despite `-DDISABLE_CPU_OPTIMIZATION=ON` being passed. This is intentional to support the cross-compiling workflow for the FreeDV application. From the top-level `CMakeLists.txt` file: ``` # Detection of available...

> @tmiw - does freedv-gui still build without LPCNet? IIRC it required LPCNet a while back. I haven't tried recently, though. Regardless, there is logic in the freedv-gui code to...

> Actually I feel this is the key to this Issue. Rather than relying on a run time test, and committing our team to support and maintenance on platforms where...