tmbb

> Right, I was missing that, sorry. So yeah we might have to do the aggregations as soon as possible in the test. If you want to collect them as...

I have a question regarding stateful testing in general. As long as you're not messing with the scheduler, it's just a question of generating valid command sequences (according to the...

> as @tmbb already mentioned, we should be fine just storing ExUnit's seed This is NOT what I said! Saving the random seed is useful, but it limits you to...

@fishcakez That's true, but if the generators change, then you actually have very few guarantees... You'd have to serialize the values themselves and not the seed, and I don't know...

@jeffkreeftmeijer Ok, I just wanted to make sure I was communicating my idea correctly :) @josevalim If I'm reading the code correctly, [this function](https://github.com/whatyouhide/stream_data/blob/e29ff81e27f53827adfc67ac9f9952c3c7b2b8ff/lib/stream_data.ex#L1618) is probably a good place to...

> In those situations it is likely that generators would change over time @fishcakez I'm not familiar with state machine testing, but wouldn't you be able to generate the state...

@fishcakez Yes, I think you're right. In that case you'll be rewriting the generator. I wonder if the hypothesis bytestring approach (from Python) could help you here... Probably not, unless...

Just to go back to this issue of storing bad examples. In practice, erlang terms can often be serializeable (even functions). I now think that if this is ever going...

First I have to tell you that ExAdmin is currently GREAT, from the user's point of view, especially for apps with little data. That said, I'm a little new to...

@smpallen99 Supporting both seems like too much work for little benefit. But if the implementation is very easy, I guess it's a possibility.