Tanya Spero

@davegill -- Thank you for the reminder. Which branch should I submit to? --Tanya

I just need to check the mods against the current release (which I have not yet downloaded). I'll try to submit a PR later today.

@davegill -- I could not get the code to attach to the PR, and hopefully I didn't botch it. Please reach out to me via email so I can send...

Hi @ramespada! Thank you for bringing this limitation of MCIP to my attention. Indeed you are correct that MCIP is unnecessarily restricting the definitions of the Mercator projection domains to...

@cenlinhe and @andreazonato -- Yes, I agree. After thinking about this more yesterday, I decided that the implementation should values for each LCZ_n that are unique from each other and...

@dudhia -- True. I guess it's a matter of how the developers want to proceed here. Do you prefer a universal set of LCZ_n that will work for all land...

Also...if we use a universal set of LCZ_n to supplement urban categories for all land use classifications, do they need to be in the VEGPARM.TBL?

Thank you, @cenlinhe. Do you plan to include the LCZ_n in VEGPARM.TBL for the other land use classifications (e.g., NLCD40) and make the appropriate accommodations throughout the WRF system?

One more question for you, @cenlinhe: if the LCZ_n are the same for all land use classifications, then why do we need the extra lines in the VEGPARM.TBL? Why not...

Hi @islas! I submitted this PR with the intent of moving into WRFv4.6, but I did not realize that you were prepping for release at the time that I put...