Twan Koolen

Hmm, so an issue with this is that currently, the `q` and `v` that are passed in are not copied, but instead become the backing arrays of `SegmentedVector`s stored in...

Yes, should be possible, using ~~`set_joint_to_predecessor`~~ `set_joint_to_successor!` (undocumented), or by directly setting `joint.joint_successor[]` as you did. If you created a `MechanismState` for your `Mechanism` and you didn't do anything else...

For the generic norm, this happens because of this line: https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/blob/6da7aa8faf5cff49c462918a339435f4d703b999/stdlib/LinearAlgebra/src/generic.jl#L403 If we wanted to do this in Rotations, I think we'd similarly have to add a branch that explicitly...

It looks like both with `f1` and `f3` the negative-sqrt-argument (error) branch is being eliminated, so that's not an issue we need to worry about. I also tried ```julia function...

Thanks for the quick response. > I think there is also a bug where the alpha value can get set to 0.999 but the spinbox editor rounds it up and...

Not sure how this would change for 0.7, but is it not possible to do something like https://github.com/JuliaEditorSupport/julia-vscode/blob/58afeec6b5244c8ae4358c8ce7000b5121751001/src/packagepath.ts#L15-L17

Yeah, the version bounds on WebIO are becoming a bit much for the resolver to handle it seems. https://github.com/JuliaRobotics/RigidBodySim.jl/issues/115. Maybe changing the order in which you add packages will help...

You'll need to add all the objects you'll ever use to the visualizer first using `setobject!`, and then I think you should just be able to use `setvisible!` at the...

You should pass `frame[:box1]` as an argument to `setvisible!` instead of `vis[:box1]`, but with that change it still doesn't work yet. It should be possible though, since https://threejs.org/docs/index.html#manual/en/introduction/Animation-system explicitly mentions...

Could you provide your `Project.toml` and `Manifest.toml` (e.g. using https://gist.github.com/, or just in a comment).