Tom Davidson

Would this allow two or more spikes from different units with the same timestamp? (This can happen in real data)

I think I disagree with moving it. The schema already describes the ‘dims’ field as labels on the dimensions of (nwb) datasets. The question is just how pynwb should expose...

Ah now I see what you mean. matnwb would need to store/read this the same way. I am not wedded to attaching these to the HDF5 dataset. Maybe the more...

As this gets implemented, it may be worth thinking ahead to the implementation of 'dimension scales' as proposed at NeurodataWithoutBorders/pynwb#626 as well. Given how nicely dim labels and dim scales...

Would vote for a less-specific name, like 'Spectrum', or 'PowerSpectrum', since the periodogram is but one method of computing a spectral density estimate: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spectral_density_estimation I'm concerned that it may be...

I agree that the flexibility of the format means that it sometimes not obvious how where to start. I am not averse to adding some optional processingModule names, but I...

I'm all for removing 'Clustering'. I've been thinking of Clustering+SpikeEventSeries as being superseded by the new Unit table (for Unit metadata including clustering metrics) and UnitTimes (for spike times of...

This would also resolve #111, which requests additional fields be added to Clustering.

My issue with the older "Clustering+ClusterWaveforms+SpikeEventSeries" was that it was all tied pretty closely to a particular clustering workflow (I think it was KlustaKwik?), and folks also found it was...

Conversation seems to be continuing over at #194, in case anyone else is following along.