TJ
TJ
@pikitgb yea I haven't had time
I thought about that, it would be nice to just use Up's hooks, but I'm not sure it's feasible to support every language in one docker image (let alone every...
I definitely agree it'd be nice to retain the hooks. Maybe we could leverage these ones https://hub.docker.com/r/lambci/lambci since they have all the versions. I'll try to check that out today!
Yeah for sure, not sure if phantom has a good mechanism for that ATM, but it would be nice to have. In lots of cases (SPAs etc) there isn't really...
I think it's fair to say most people would be just using 4.3 going forward, for that reason I don't think it's necessary
Ah, yea we should have had a changelog note for that, I'll add something
Hmmmm maybe by default the content and theme is overridden, and we have some sub-command to save the ./theme for editing, after which it's ignored unless you explicitly update it...
yea you'd have to merge or something, but I don't think just a head.html for example would be sufficient depending on what you want to tweak. Generally I don't think...
ahah silly AWS APIs..., looks good to me though, mind adding a test? I suppose we could probably always _just_ set the multiple headers one? Since Go gives you a...
@davidfaynzilberg check out the readme, there's an example. It's basically a drop-in replacement for net/http for Lambda