Tim van der Meij

I haven't seen such a bug being reported before, but it doesn't sound like a PDF.js bug to me at least given that we have pretty much no control over...

I'm not sure why the analyzer run above failed because the error seems unrelated to this issue: ``` /home/runner/work/puppeteer/puppeteer/node_modules/semver/classes/semver.js:38 throw new TypeError(`Invalid Version: ${version}`) ^ TypeError: Invalid Version: 18 ```...

> Just spoke internally about this problem and it's not visible anymore when [upgrading to 22.3.0](https://github.com/mozilla/pdf.js/pull/17733). > > I would suggest closing the issue. Thank you for looking into this!...

I'm not sure why the analyzer has trouble reproducing this because `UnsupportedOperation` is the only error string that is logged when the reproducer is run locally, and given the `Script...

Thank you for the feedback! We currently use https://github.com/mozilla/pdf.js/blob/master/test/integration/test_utils.mjs#L356-L359 and that works. It's mainly that I was reading the documentation and thought that using the `Mouse.dragAndDrop` API would perhaps be...

Moreover, if it helps, please feel free to use this reduced test case and the one from #9461 in your test suite. Given these two regressions there is probably some...

Thank you! Splitting off the browser package sounds good. We'll try again soon with the most recent version of Puppeteer.

Puppeteer 20 seems to work now if we start the browsers in series, which is fine. We used to start them in parallel, but that still causes version number confusion...

I'm afraid I can't help out with this because I'm not familiar with the ECRA and its legal implications. Perhaps the Mozilla legal team can help out with this?

I'm not entirely sure because I can't find a direct e-mail address of the legal team, but I did find https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/foundation/licensing about licensing with an e-mail address at the bottom...