Timothy Basanov

It would be nice to have a special workaround for Safari. A lot of people use this app on Macs. When viewed in Activity Monitor it looks like all Safari...

This issue is not about task cancellation, it's about Failsafe `Timeout` behaviour. When I do `future.get()` on the `Future` returned from Failsafe I expect that it would finish after a...

I see. These arguments make sense. I also just realized that this policy is applied consistently, i.e. when execution is "async" timeout is just completely ignored as it has no...

> Not a Contribution. To better align with #159, mentioning hedged requests as they are seemingly are a different name/flavor for staggered requests.

> Not a contribution. One example, it should be possible to implement Support staggered retries #291 or Considering allowing a Future result to be completed immediately when a Timeout occurs...

> Not a contribution. Yep, all the methods and classes currently referenced from a timeout or retry policies and executions (e.g. an abstract execution's methods, a timeout execution itself). A...

> Not a Contribution As an exercise I've tried to create a few custom policies. A few things that spring to my attention: * `Timeout` only has a private constructor,...

> Not a Contribution. > > Timeout only has a private constructor, so I can't extend it > So you'd prefer a protected constructor? Are you using Timeout with the...

> Not a Contribution. Not sure if I understand backup requests correctly, so I'm describing a behaviour that would be nice to have in my case: Backup request is a...

> Not a Contribution. I fully agree that this is a potentially dangerous behaviour change. In my case, I'm ready to pay almost any price to get timeouts to work....