Tim Hollebeek
Tim Hollebeek
I'll put it on next week's Validation WG agenda.
It has not been resolved, but only because we've been discussing other things. I can put it on next Thursday's agenda again if there's interest in discussing it.
Thanks @aarongable, this is really great. -Tim
I oppose this. It is an unnecessary warning that will just increase confusion instead of decreasing it. There's no reason to consider it risky to generate only the exact amount...
Well, so the problem is that the actual requirement is: "MUST be a non‐sequential number greater than zero (0) and less than 2¹⁵⁹ containing at least 64 bits of output...