tilmes

I think, that there are people out there that still use different model configurations, like CAM4/WACCM4 (like Chuck for CARMA), and maybe CAM5 (I am not sure). I am not...

@adamrher @wwieder I am not implementing any dust changes or perform a parallel effort. The updates in MAM4 bin widths for the coarse mode (equivalent to MAM5 using chemistry) complement...

It would be good to have most of the changes in that influence aerosols they in particular influence clouds and any tuning will have to be redone if we leave...

@ekluzek we are only changing the size for the coarse mode dust bin for CAM with simple chemistry. This is going back to CAM5 and since we did not change...

@dmleung A quick answer to the MAM5 implementation. For dust, there will actually be no change in the number of notes, we still have dst_a1, dst_a2, dst_a3. The only change...

I am doing a low-top model run with all the output, so we can run more comprehensive diagnostics and will post it asap. The earlier diagnostics show zonal mean aerosol...

Here are the new diagnostics with the low-top model: https://acomstaff.acom.ucar.edu/tilmes/amwg/cam7/f.e23_beta02.FLTHIST_ne30.conv_dz_bug_1995_2004_vs_f.e23_beta02.FLTHIST_ne30.001_1995_2004/website/index.html Very little change, a little bit in dust AOD, Simone

@adamrher I performed a nudged model simulation using alpha07e.ctsm5.3.075, before Danny's dust tuning, but we set the seasalt_emis_scale to 1.0. We nudged to MERRA2 for 2016-2018 and I compared to...

@adamrher you can run the AOD comparisions with MODIS and MERRA, they are in the default ADF.. not sure how to turn on though, Justin should know.

@adamrher We need the species from the specific IC file, and yes, this file has been spun up, so the tracers need to have the values in the original IC...