Tieson Trowbridge

@yonjah I think we'll have to agree to disagree. I respect your input and value the time you've put into this, but I don't agree with the changes you want...

> Is this the desired behaviour? Not really, but native validation is not easy to deal with. You can see what we're doing here: https://github.com/makeusabrew/bootbox/blob/master/bootbox.js#L609 - `checkValidity()` is enough to...

Hmmmmmm. [reportValidity](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/HTMLFormElement/reportValidity) might actually work. Problem is, it's not supported in Internet Explorer, which we (I, really) are still trying to support. So, you could always fork this repo and...

So... that does actually seem to work. https://jsfiddle.net/0oz5x94y/ Like I mentioned, though, it won't work in IE, so I can't just make that change and publish. I'd need to spend...

The buttons for alert, confirm, and prompt are all generated by the same helper, and it doesn't really make sense for alert and confirm to have a submit button. Might...

It all depends on a combination of motivation and opportunity - I'd like the validation parts to work consistently, if I can do it without a significant investment of time....

Plans? Not really, at least not for this repo. This is covered, more or less, in #756. BS5 will still have jQuery support (they added a helper library that will...

I just pulled down beta1 and ran the Bootbox docs with it (which uses our 5.5.2 release) and it seems to work as expected. The markup for a modal seems...

As I noted, I tested the current version of Bootbox against the Beta1 of Bootstrap and it worked. So, caveat emptor, but it's usable. Not going to remove jQuery at...

I'd prefer not to go that route - our modals should work the same as if a dev built the modal themselves (at it's core, Bootbox is just a dynamic...