François Daoust
François Daoust
PR is ready but still pending [shortname change](https://github.com/WICG/web_audio_playout/issues/3).
@browser-specs-bot PR
To be added but spec is empty now and defines exported placeholder terms "term 1" and "term 2".
Various sections are still "TBD" but the spec is progressing and no longer defines fake content. Seems worth adding. I was thinking I would remove the "browser" category... but then...
@browser-specs-bot pr
CDDL definitions are not exported by default because they are not part of a single namespace. Various specs could define CDDL types such as `error`, `message`, `event`, etc. to mean...
> For example, https://wicg.github.io/sanitizer-api/#dom-sanitizer-allowelement-element-element is a method argument that is never referenced explicitly. But building the spec doesn't generate a warning about that. The definitions in that spec seem strange...
> If this is to be valid, I would like it specified. Do you plan to report this? Done. Spec was updated, see end of [Component Value Multipliers](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-4/#component-multipliers) section.
I don't think that approach can be generalized in practice. The two WHATWG entries with versions (`WEBIDL` and `WEBSOCKETS`) record *historical* versions, when specs were still being published by W3C....
Thanks, that helps! It suggests that there's no easy way to avoid maintaining such data manually _somehow_ and _somewhere_: * For _somewhere_, we've refrained from doing this in Webref until...