François Daoust
François Daoust
> My suggestion would be to have the dated versions tied to the unversioned entry, so: `FOO-20240201`, not `FOO-2-20240201`. In the `css-fonts` example, both `css-fonts-4` and `css-fonts-5` are currently active...
css-2024 still hasn't been published and is on hold as well.
To be added once the spec gets published.
Note published. @browser-specs-bot pr
URL was reported before I included the multi-repos logic, which should now exclude the `sdw-sosa-ssn` folder from the `w3c/sdw`. Closing.
Hmm, previous comment is wrong in practice. This is a separate repository that happens to also appear under `w3c/sdw` as a Git submodule... The repository also contains multiple specs and...
Pending clarity on status of the spec as the entry in Chromestatus currently says "No longer pursuing": https://chromestatus.com/feature/5713333428682752
[New Chromestatus entry](https://chromestatus.com/feature/5032324620877824) indicates active work on the proposal, and support from Webkit. Spec status was also updated to "Draft CG Report". Seems good to add! @browser-specs-bot pr
> Syntax-wise, the CDDL extracts should be valid. CDDL syntax is now guaranteed to be valid (according to `cddlparser`) in curated extracts.
@browser-specs-bot pr