Timothy Noble

Is this issue still wanting to be open? As far as I can tell it has been merged and re-opened after it was merged @martynia?

Here is the start of my monitoring Repo: https://github.com/Thysk/Rucio-Monitoring I am still working to include database based monitoring using logstash pipelines

Over the winter holiday I have come back and still none of the type2 larger files have been generated by any of the three automatix. I get the feeling I...

All my config is specified in the values files Automatix parameters - https://gitlab.com/ral-multi-vo-rucio/m-vo-rucio-deployment/-/blob/main/overlays/prod/rucio/values-rucio-daemons.yaml?ref_type=heads#L748 daemons rucio.cfg - https://gitlab.com/ral-multi-vo-rucio/m-vo-rucio-deployment/-/blob/main/overlays/prod/rucio/values-rucio-daemons.yaml?ref_type=heads#L748 Server config -https://gitlab.com/ral-multi-vo-rucio/m-vo-rucio-deployment/-/blob/main/overlays/prod/rucio/values-rucio-server.yaml?ref_type=heads#L310

@bari12 I have added the default behaviour back as you suggested. However with the rebase the python_ruff test is now failing on files not touched by this PR

@cserf Sorry for requesting the review from you, I forgot usernames to people for a moment