Thom May

Hey @joelhandwell @glasschef does this bug still occur (sorry it's 18 months later). If it does, can you provide a replication case in the form of the actual cookbook that...

thanks @tquid

I'm not sure there's a way of sensibly fixing this now - demunging cookbook_name is just going to break existing rewind users

This is #2 - but I'm not sure how to make it work.

@TheSerapher the PR doesn't actually work, though. Which is why it's not merged :)

Hey, I've rebased this and fixed the tests so that rspec at least passes under chef 11 and chef 12, but I have no idea how to actually use this...

This is a duplicate of #3, I guess. We've fixed the unwind case, but not (yet) the rewind case.

Hm, you're right sorry. I'll construct some test cases and see what this looks like.

I tested this, and found that (with current master) I just needed the second rewind block; the first was superfluous. Can you test with the 0.0.9 release and confirm this?

What does your default route look like (`netstat -rn`would be really helpful here).